ISYE6335 - Layout of Piece-Picking from Cartons

0007/02/01 Supply-Chain Reading time: about 16 mins
# Layout of piece-picking from cartons (ISYE6335)

Paths of material flow in a piece-distribution center

Layout decisions when designing piece(each) forward pick area

  • How much of each SKU should be stored in forward pick area 3 stocking strategies
  • Which SKUs to store forward? Ranking the SKUs by bang-for-buck
  • How large should the forward pick area be?

Easy extensions:

  • Product families
  • Multiple forward areas

1. How much forward space should a SKU get?

1.1 Common stocking strategies: EQS vs. EQT

1.2 Obj: Minimize Laybor Costs

  • Picking time: Picking from forward area is more efficient, most of the time
  • Restocking time: Number of restocks * restocking cost per restock

Denote estimated number of retocks (approximated restocking frequency): \(\frac{f_i}{v_i} = \frac{\text{flow in cubic-ft/yr}}{\text{volume stored in forward-pick area}}\)

Why say $f_i/v_i$ is an estimation/approximatiom?

  • Ignores the need to safety stock $\to$ underestimate restock frequency
  • Ignores possible batching in restocking when an order line for SKU_i > $v_i\to$ overestimates restock frequency

1.3 Fraction of space allocated to each SKU

If $n$ SKUs in forward area, each with flow $f_i$, suppose the total space is normalized to be $V=1$

  • EQS: $v_i=1/n$
  • EQT: we want $f_i/v_i$ identical for all SKUs \(v_i=\frac{f_i}{C}=\frac{f_i}{\sum^n_{j=1}f_j}\)

1.4 Number of restocks

EQS

\(\frac{f_i}{v_i}=\frac{f_i}{1/n}=nf_i\)

  • Total restocks across all $n$ SKUs $=n\sum_{j=1}^nf_j$
  • Fraction of restocks to SKU_i $=f_i/\sum_jf_j$

EQT

(number of restocks for every SKU is identical) \(\frac{f_i}{v_i}=\frac{f_i}{f_i/\sum f_j}=\sum_{j=1}^n f_j\)

  • Total restocks across all $n$ SKUs $=n\sum_{j=1}^nf_j$
  • Fraction of restocks to SKU_i $=1/n$

到这里不难发现,对于 EQS vs. EQT

  1. section 1.3 中的 fraction of space allocated 和这里的 fraction of restocks 的公式正好相互对调
  2. 两种方式的 total restockes 一样 $\to$ same amount of work!

1.5 Optimal space allocation strategy

If $n$ SKUs in forward area, each with flow $f_i$, suppose the total space is normalized to be $V=1$

\[\min\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{f_i}{v_i}\]

where, $\sum_{i=1}^n v_i\leq 1$, $v_i\geq 0$

\[\boxed{v^*_i=\frac{\sqrt{f_i}}{\sum^n_{j=1}\sqrt{f_j}}}\]
  • Restocks of SKU_i $=\sqrt{f_i}\sum^n_{j=1}\sqrt{f_j}$
  • Total restocks across all $n$ SKUs $=(\sum_{j=1}^n\sqrt{f_j})^2$
  • Fraction of restocks to SKU_i $=\sqrt{f_i}/\sum\sqrt{f_j}$

Note that here fraction of restocks is equal to location allocated $v_i$

1.6 Comparing EQS vs. EQT vs. OPT

1.7 Example

$V = 80-40 = 40
v^_A=\sqrt{90}/(\sqrt{90}+\sqrt{250}+\sqrt{490})=0.2
V^
_A=0.240=8<10\implies V^_A=10$

$V=80-40-10=30
v^_B=\sqrt{250}/(\sqrt{250}+\sqrt{490})=0.42
V^
_B=0.4230=12.6>10
V^
_C=17.4>15$

therefore, $\boxed{V^_A=10, V^_B=12.6, V^*_C=17.4}$

2. Which SKUs should go into the forward area?

2.1 Obj: Maximize Net Benefit

If $n$ SKUs in forward area, each with flow $f_i$, suppose the total space is normalized to be $V=1$

\[\max \sum_i(sp_i-c_r\frac{f_i}{v_i})x_i\] \[s.t.\begin{cases} \sum_i v_ix_i &\leq 1\\ v_i&\geq 0\\ x_i&\in\{0,1\} \end{cases}\]

Bang-for-buck \((sp_i-\frac{c_rf_i}{v_i})/v_i\)

$p_i$: number of picks $x_i$: whether or not to store SKU_i

Knapsack: $v_i,x_i$ are all decision variables, which make the first constraint hard to consider

2.2 Determine $v_i$

To solve the knapsack above, we need to determine(fix) $v_i$. There are three possible ways including EQS, EQT and OPT, here we choose OPT:

\[\max \sum_i(sp_i-c_r\frac{f_i}{\frac{\sqrt{f_i}}{\sum\sqrt{f_i}}})x_i\]

Sorting by $\frac{p_i}{\sqrt{f_i}}$ is equivalent to sorting by bang-for-buck = (这里式子很复杂,就是把 OPT 的 $v_i$ 带入 bang-for-buck 的公式中去)

Guest Lecture: FORTNA

Fortna designs distribution operations DC Design Methodology with a Focus of Picking Activity

Measure of Success improve our design

  • quality and repeatability
  • ability to scale the organization

improve our client’s ability to operate

1. Picking Methodologies Design

Three main steps of Design Methodology

  • Inputs: Design, Requirements
  • Construction: Picking, Methodology Selection and Feasibility
  • Improvement: Technology & Refinement Optimization

1.1 Picking Methodologies

Cluster Picking (Discrete Orders)Batch Picking
picking one or multiple orders at a time directly to individual orderspicking multiple SKUs at a time without regrad to order integrity
does not require an extra-touch process to created the orderrequires an extra-touch process coordinated over multiple areas to create the order
 优点: larger picking density, higher productivity

Extra-Touch Methodologies

  • Manual
  • Automated Sortation w/no buffer (Unit Sorter)
  • Automated Sortation with buffer (Pocket/Pouch Sorter) (buffer 可以避免产生需要先储存再运出去的麻烦)

1.1.2 How to compare?

|Cluster Picking| Batch Picking |-|-| |Cluster pick cart| Batch pick cart |Units per hour(UPH) 60 units/ 0.75 hr = 80 UPH| 40 units/ 0.4 hr = 100 UPH |No extra-touch| Extra-touch: manual put wall @ 200 UPH

Blended UPH = (1/UPH$P$ + 1/UPH${ET}$)$^{-1}$ Cluster Picking is better because $1/80 < (1/100+1/200)$

1.2 Solution Design

  • Tri-delima: Cycle Time, Equipment & Systems, Productivity

2. Picking Technologies (Goods to Person)

TechProsCons
Autonomous Mobile Robotics with Movable Racks- Flexibility in storage of product
- Ease of deployment
- Utilization of cubic space
- No ergonomic enhancements to picking
Aisle-Based Shuttle Systems- High throughout possible
- Ergonomic picking
- Produt can be stored in totes, cases or cases on trays
- High capital, especially conveyor loop to network aisles to workstations
- Cannot scale storage and throughput independently
Rack-Based Storage with Robots- Ergonomic
- Can scale storage and throughput independently
- Eliminate need for a conveyor loop
- Product can be stored in totes or cases on trays
- Aisles for AMR travel decrease storage density
Top-Loading Bins with Robots- Highest cubic density of any GTP tech
- Ergonomic
- Can scale storage and throughput independently
- Is often the lowest-cost solution
- Product must be stored in totes
- Floors must be very flat
- Workstations cannot achieve rate of some other GTPs
- Digging buried bins increases the number of required robots
- Well-publicized fire has led to required additional infrastructure

Guest Lecture

What does it take to manage a warehouse in 2022?

Document Information

Search

    Table of Contents